QUOTE(LS CalamityJane @ Nov 21 2006, 01:41 PM)

Hi Music Man,
Thanks for sharing your findings

Those three all together that you found do have some overlap, so I'm not surprised if you use all 3 at the same time it might cause a lag in the scanning. I use IESPYAD so I don't use the Spybot immunize feature nor the SpywareBlaster restricted sites (those pretty much duplicate IESPYAD), though I do use the ActiveX protection in SpywareBlaster.
The same might be true if you also use a HOSTS file as those databases can be quite large sometimes.
My scans do take a little longer I've noticed when I have IESPYAD activated but the over 20,000 known bad websites it puts in the restricted zone I think is worth the extra time.
I might try to see if I can duplicate the problem using the methods you found. I don't find a problem with IESPYAD alone but haven't tried it with the other two features of SB and SWB on.

Hello LS CalamityJane,
Thank you for sharing your knowledge!
I may reconsider and not use Spybot immunize feature and Spywareblaster restricted sites.
I knew there was an overlap with IESPYAD, but I have also read that there is no harm to use all three.
Try this: With IESPYAD loaded (without SB & SWB) start a scan with ad-aware. Then open your task manager and watch your applications status.
When the scan on my computer gets to typelib the status turns to "not responding". After a long pause the program starts running again.
This tells me that ad-aware is not scanning at all during this time. Rather it is experiencing some technical problem. It must have something to do with either the amount of information, or the information itself that IESPYAD loads into IE restricted sites zone. IESPYAD has made my web surfing much safer and I will always be thankful for such great programs. Is it possible that there is an issue with ad-aware and IE restricted sites zone?
When I uninstall IESPYAD and test again there is no problem during the scan.
I look forward to your reply.
Music Man