QUOTE(casey_boy @ Sep 3 2009, 05:24 PM)

That's what I'm going on
Casey
Thanks for the clarification. No doubt ever crossed my mind about your statement being truthful. And coming from Lavasoft sources, it should also be accurate and reliable. And it may very well be. The only thing is, for lay-people like myself, it does not make much sense, and I hope you agree with me on this one.
As much as I can tell, there is no other known program that presents the same behavior, so how can it be brushed aside by Lavasoft as a Windows bug? Why would this particular bug reveal itself only with Ad-Aware? Possible? Maybe, I don't know. Plausible? I don't think so.
But if my assumption is correct, I say it would be much better that Lavasoft came out more candidly and just said, "hey, it must be a bug on our code, but since it causes only minor inconvenience and no danger at all, we will look at it in due course"...
Let's keep it in perspective. As it has been said before, this is a non-issue. The only unfortunate potential side effect would be if any negative reflection would end up hurting the credibility of whomever speaks for Lavasoft. This is the only risk, in my view.
In fact, this is a great company and a great program, and being allowed to use it for free is a great privilege that must be acknowledged and commended by everyone who benefits from it. I do.
Regards.