IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Ad-Aware SE Personal, b1.06r1 says "Warning! Definitions file not found or corrupted!" in Windows 98 SE.
Ant
post Jun 15 2008, 12:59 AM
Post #1


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 36
Joined: 25-August 06
Member No.: 10,176



I finally updated my father's old laptop/notebook with Windows 98 SE (Toshiba OEM and all updates from Windows Update). I updated his old "Ad-Aware SE Personal, b1.06r1 with the latest defs.ref file I downloaded (tried both 6/9/2008 and 6/12/2008). It now says "Warning! Definitions file not found or corrupted!" I tried other Ad-Aware SE Personal installation (not going to upgrade to the newer version at this time) in two XP Pro. SP2 and 2000 SP4, and they were fine.

I have two screen shots with the errors: http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/1274/ad...al106r1dvi0.gif

What's up? Will this be fixed soon if it is a known issue? Thank you in advance.

This post has been edited by Ant: Jun 15 2008, 01:00 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gelert
post Jun 15 2008, 11:51 AM
Post #2


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 215
Joined: 21-July 07
From: Bicester, Oxfordshire, UK
Member No.: 33,150



QUOTE(Ant @ Jun 15 2008, 12:59 AM) *
I finally updated my father's old laptop/notebook with Windows 98 SE (Toshiba OEM and all updates from Windows Update). I updated his old "Ad-Aware SE Personal, b1.06r1 with the latest defs.ref file I downloaded (tried both 6/9/2008 and 6/12/2008). It now says "Warning! Definitions file not found or corrupted!" I tried other Ad-Aware SE Personal installation (not going to upgrade to the newer version at this time) in two XP Pro. SP2 and 2000 SP4, and they were fine.

I have two screen shots with the errors: http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/1274/ad...al106r1dvi0.gif

What's up? Will this be fixed soon if it is a known issue? Thank you in advance.

Hi Ant,

There are a whole load of threads on page 1 of this forum, basically discussing and coming to the same conclusion that all AdAware SE definitions, later than SE1R247 (13 May 2008), will not work on Win98-based OS.

LavaSoft are aware of this issue.
But as SE is now obsolete, they are not going to pursue the matter or provide a fix.

There is an option for you to obtain SE1R247, which you will find if you read through the latest threads...

Hope this helps...?


--------------------
XP Pro SP3; ZoneAlarm Internet Security Suite v8.0.059; WinPatrol Plus v15.9.2008.5; SpywareBlaster v4.1;
Spybot S&D v1.6.0.31 (TeaTimer Disabled); Piriform CCleaner v2.15.815; MBSA x86 v2.1; WICU rubbish;
Asus A8N-SLI Deluxe; AMD Athlon Newcastle 64 Processor 3500+; Sata RAID 1 (Mirror) 70Gb Raptors;
Corsair XMS3200 2GB 2x1024MB DDR CAS2; Asus Probe II, and Cool n'Quiet enabled in BIOS.
A little blue thing that goes "Whoop" on alternate Tuesdays.
43-byte ASCII input MD5 = 9e107d9d372bb6826bd81d3542a419d6 = "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog"
05 August 2008: ex-SE Plus user; ex-AdAware 2008 Plus user. "So long, and thanks for all the fish...."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ant
post Jun 16 2008, 06:27 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 36
Joined: 25-August 06
Member No.: 10,176



QUOTE(gelert @ Jun 15 2008, 03:51 AM) *
Hi Ant,

There are a whole load of threads on page 1 of this forum, basically discussing and coming to the same conclusion that all AdAware SE definitions, later than SE1R247 (13 May 2008), will not work on Win98-based OS.

LavaSoft are aware of this issue.
But as SE is now obsolete, they are not going to pursue the matter or provide a fix.

There is an option for you to obtain SE1R247, which you will find if you read through the latest threads...

Hope this helps...?
That is disappointing. It works fine in XP SP2 and 2000 SP4, but not 98 SE? sad.gif I guess I will have to uninstall it then and use competitors' that still support 9x since I want the latest updates.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
yxxxx
post Jun 16 2008, 08:12 PM
Post #4


Ad-Aware 2007-2008 Beta Tester
***

Group: Valued Member
Posts: 171
Joined: 6-June 07
From: England
Member No.: 28,351



I fear its going to be an ever increasing trend especially as microsoft them selfs have stopped support for windows 98.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gelert
post Jun 16 2008, 09:32 PM
Post #5


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 215
Joined: 21-July 07
From: Bicester, Oxfordshire, UK
Member No.: 33,150



QUOTE(gelert @ Jun 15 2008, 11:51 AM) *
Hi Ant,

There are a whole load of threads on page 1 of this forum, basically discussing and coming to the same conclusion that all AdAware SE definitions, later than SE1R247 (13 May 2008), will not work on Win98-based OS.

LavaSoft are aware of this issue.
But as SE is now obsolete, they are not going to pursue the matter or provide a fix.

There is an option for you to obtain SE1R247, which you will find if you read through the latest threads...

Hope this helps...?

Most all of this Forum has now been archived... huh.gif

...it's the end of an era...


--------------------
XP Pro SP3; ZoneAlarm Internet Security Suite v8.0.059; WinPatrol Plus v15.9.2008.5; SpywareBlaster v4.1;
Spybot S&D v1.6.0.31 (TeaTimer Disabled); Piriform CCleaner v2.15.815; MBSA x86 v2.1; WICU rubbish;
Asus A8N-SLI Deluxe; AMD Athlon Newcastle 64 Processor 3500+; Sata RAID 1 (Mirror) 70Gb Raptors;
Corsair XMS3200 2GB 2x1024MB DDR CAS2; Asus Probe II, and Cool n'Quiet enabled in BIOS.
A little blue thing that goes "Whoop" on alternate Tuesdays.
43-byte ASCII input MD5 = 9e107d9d372bb6826bd81d3542a419d6 = "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog"
05 August 2008: ex-SE Plus user; ex-AdAware 2008 Plus user. "So long, and thanks for all the fish...."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ant
post Jun 17 2008, 01:28 AM
Post #6


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 36
Joined: 25-August 06
Member No.: 10,176



QUOTE(gelert @ Jun 16 2008, 01:32 PM) *
Most all of this Forum has now been archived... huh.gif

...it's the end of an era...
I guess we will bail SE then.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
iluvSE
post Jun 17 2008, 08:48 PM
Post #7


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 28-May 08
Member No.: 58,222



QUOTE(Ant @ Jun 17 2008, 01:28 AM) *
I guess we will bail SE then.


Quoting 'Calamity Jane'....
SE is obsolete and outdated badly for today's malware and you really need to think about getting something for your Win98 (or ME). This list of trusted Antispyware Products is here:
http://www.spywarewarrior.com/rogue_anti-s...htm#trustworthy

At least two of those offer a free version that is compatible for Win98 and ME
(Spybot Search & Destroy and SuperAntispyware)

That is what I recommend you 98 and ME users need to do at this point.
http://www.lavasoftsupport.com/index.php?showtopic=18270


Indeed, it is sad to say farewell. But at least it's still working for XP at present?

Checkout the above thread item/web link from Calamity Jane - very useful. SUPERantispywarrior is free, but takes a loooong time to scan, (may not be so suitable for laptop batteries).

If you want to read the 'epic' struggle, checkout the threads below...
http://www.lavasoftsupport.com/index.php?showtopic=18145
http://www.lavasoftsupport.com/index.php?showtopic=18269


huh.gif


--------------------
"keep tellin' yourself......it's only a machine.......arrrgh!"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 02:40 PM