IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> wrong date displayed for latest reference file 0042.0000
Moby Duck
post Jan 2 2008, 02:47 PM
Post #1


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 86
Joined: 23-May 07
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 27,599



Ad-Aware 2007 downloaded the latest reference file today. Why on earth does the update date stubbornly indicate 28.12.07 when it should be 02.01.08 or something which corresponds to TODAY'S date?

Attached Image


During the scan, Ad-Aware says that it is scanning with the current file 0042.0000, and the definition file itself (core.aawdef) bears the name "0042.0000" - I checked.
Finally, Ad-Aware 2007 takes double the amount of time to scan (which I can understand since it is a more thorough engine), and it also declares that the scanner is busy and that an error/problem has taken place if I want to run a scan right after downloading the reference file (that happened today). I terminated the program via task manager, opened the program again and it was able to scan. Glitchy software indeed.

This post has been edited by Moby Duck: Jan 2 2008, 03:27 PM


--------------------
"No fruit dies so vile and offensive a death as the banana."
-Kiran Desai, The Inheritance of Loss
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
floplo
post Jan 3 2008, 09:42 PM
Post #2


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 93
Joined: 27-June 06
Member No.: 5,116



Hi
I find that after downloading the latest definition file, I have to close the program, then reopen it and it will have the right date on it. That is the only thing I can fix with the program.....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moby Duck
post Jan 10 2008, 04:20 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 86
Joined: 23-May 07
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 27,599



Hi floplo (and all those who have read the above): when I encountered further problems in connection with definition files (Ad-Aware crashing after downloading and installing the latest def file), I opened a separate post which you can find it here:

http://www.lavasoftsupport.com/index.php?s...amp;#entry66179

Spike_nz answered; s/he says that it is a normal problem and is being worked upon. We've just got to keep our computers, er, eyes peeled for more info (cf. afore-mentioned post).


--------------------
"No fruit dies so vile and offensive a death as the banana."
-Kiran Desai, The Inheritance of Loss
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 12:27 PM